Author: davesgonechina

Jingjing and Chacha, China’s virtual internet cartoon cops, sometimes walk across select webpages on the Chinese ‘net and say “远离淫秽色情倡导文明上网” and “拒色低俗内容弘扬和谐向上”, which translates roughly as “eliminate obscene pornography, support a civilized ‘net” and “resist pornographic, base and vulgar content, promote a harmonious [society]”. Refresh to view again, there are three below.

http://www.sinaimg.cn/home/swf/110_750_01.swf
http://www.sinaimg.cn/home/swf/110_750_02.swf
http://www.sinaimg.cn/home/swf/110_750_03.swf
(Links provided by Feng37, who got them from the guys at Danwei)

So Steven Spielberg has given up on trying to sway the Chinese government to make things happen in Darfur, and resigned (he never signed his contract) as an advisor to the Beijing Olympics opening ceremonies.

Mr. Spielberg, it can safely be assumed, has the best of intentions and tried in his own way to work within the system as a voice of “moral authority”, sending a letter to Hu Jintao and trying to get a meeting to discuss his concerns. He did get to meet the Chinese special envoy to Darfur at the UN, but obviously wasn’t satisfied.

So far there seem to be two sides to this. One is Mia Farrow and others who are “jubilant”. Ms Farrow, who started the “Genocide Olympics” campaign, said “His voice and all of the moral authority it gives, used this way, brings a shred of hope to Darfur, and God knows, rations of hope are meager at this time”.

On the other side we have opinions like that shared at Silicon Hutong: “Public efforts by governments, organizations, or individuals from outside of China to coerce or embarrass Beijing into a policy change on matters either foreign or domestic do not work. Instead, they consistently provoke a visceral negative response that is often seen by outsiders as disproportionate or even extreme.”

As SH points out, its not even clear if the Chinese government has enough pull with Khartoum to get them to end the crisis in Darfur. Silicon Hutong argues that “effective diplomacy … also requires tact”, and that Spielberg would have a better chance of success by working discreetly. “How wonderful it would have been to have Mr. Spielberg as a genuine public ambassador, someone with credibility and real pull in China who could help make things happen. Or, indeed, to see China active in the resolution of the Darfur situation, finding out later that Mr. Spielberg and Ms. Farrow played critical roles in driving the process.”

I think there’s another way that no one is talking about here. In a discussion with Feng37, the question was raised about whether the belief that you must work in secret is actually a tactic used by the Chinese government to prevent public embarassments. In other words, if Spielberg worked silently (and not publicized his letter to Hu Jintao or other efforts), he may have simply been strung along with the promise of slow progress until the Olympics were over, only to be ignored afterwards. But one thing that no one, not Mia Farrow, or Spielberg, or the Free Tibet crowd, are not trying, and that’s addressing the Chinese people directly. The assumption on both sides, the idealist Save Darfur campaign and the realist perspective of Silicon Hutong, is that for any movement on the issue you must petition the Chinese government. What about petitioning the Chinese people?

Imagine Spielberg’s statement on Darfur was not in English, and not delivered to Western media and the Chinese government. Imagine, instead, his first and perhaps only statement was in Chinese, and emailed and posted throughout the Chinese Internet. It could’ve read something like this:

Dear Citizens of China,

My name is Steven Spielberg. Some of you may know my name because you’ve seen some of the American movies I’ve directed. Some of you may also know that I have been working with Zhang Yimou planning the opening ceremonies of the Olympic Games. I want to tell all of you, the Chinese people, why I’m resigning from my post, because ultimately, the Beijing Olympics belong to you, the people of China, and as my employers, you deserve an explanation.

For the past several years, horrible atrocities have been occurring in the African nation of Sudan, and the world has not been doing enough to stop it. UN peacekeepers and aid workers have been expelled from the country, while thousands have been killed. I dearly wish to see peace in Sudan, and I know that the Chinese people feel the same, as they know all too well the horrors of war. The atrocities in Sudan share many similarities to the atrocities brought by the Japanese to China, just as the Nazis committed similar crimes across Europe.

More can be done to prevent these horrors in Sudan today. The Chinese government last year appointed a special envoy to Sudan and made an effort to end the violence, but attacks continue. China has a great deal of influence in Sudan, through its strong economic relationship with the government of that country. I emphatically reject any idea that China is responsible for these tragedies, as some Westerners have suggested. But I do think that China is in a unique position to lead the world in stopping these crimes, by threatening to break off all trade with the government of Sudan. Indeed, did China not naturally wish the same when foreign countries continued to trade with the Japanese Empire?

China is rapidly taking its rightful place among the great nations of the world, and you should be proud. I was and still am truly honored to be associated with the Beijing Olympics. But I have been unable to convince the leaders of China to punish Sudan for its crimes. I am not a diplomat, I am afraid. I have little talent for it, as I am only a film director. But I ask you, the Chinese people, to act on your love of peace and stability, and sever your relationship with Sudan until it stops the violence. Let the Olympics be a symbol of China’s reverence for peace and life that inspires the world. And I will continue to let the world know that the Chinese people stand, always, against the evils of war.

Your humble friend,
Steven Spielberg

I’m sure there are better ways to write such an open letter, and no doubt in Chinese there would some perfect phrases to use. But even if it was received as obnoxious or arrogant, Spielberg would have accomplished something new: he would’ve have spoken to the people, not the leaders.

Add: Along the same lines, the Nobel Laureate Open Letter to China at the Save Darfur Campaign could use a Chinese version, couldn’t it? And maybe instead of addressing Hu Jintao, address the Chinese public?

I see I’ve been hit with the 1-2-3 meme by Opposite End of China. So my nearest book is Blindness by Jose Saramago, which has some awfully long sentences, especially on page 123. As a result, sentence 6 is the last on the page and sentences 7 and 8 are actually on the next page, but here goes:

At the beginning, the very beginning, several charitable organisations were still offering volunteers to assist the blind, to make their beds, clean out their lavatories, wash their clothes, prepare their food, the minimum of care without which life soon becomes unbearable, even for those who can see. These dear people went blind immediately but at least the generosity of their gesture would go down in history. Did any of them come here, asked the old man with the black eyepatch, No, replied the doctor’s wife, no one has come, Perhaps it was a rumour, And what about the city and the traffic, asked the first blind man, remembering his own car and that of the taxi-driver who had driven him to the surgery and had helped him to dig the grave, Traffic is in a state of chaos, replied the old man with the black eyepatch, and gave details of specific cases and accidents.

See, when you write dialogue in run-on sentences, sentence 6 ends up at the end of the page. Now, my victims:

Beijing Sounds
Son of Shenzhen Zen: Hua Hin Hoo-Hah (Thai Remix)
Twelve Hours Later
Paper Republic (if they still exist?)
Blood & Treasure

I’m hoping BJSounds, 12Hours and PaperRep will bring the translated goodness.

Looking for stuff about China’s Golden Shield Project, normally associated with censorship on the Chinese web, I found this startling bit of irony. I’ve blurred the picture so as not to offend anybody, but you can visit the actual page at 51gongwen.com (caveat emptor, NSFW!), or 51 Documents. This is ironically hilarious because the websites menus include “patriotic speeches” and “anti-corruption campaign”, and the article is titled “Discussion Materials From the PSB Golden Shield Project and Population Management System Building Conference” where an official talks about how the PSB in his city is implementing IT solutions to fight crime, both online and off. Above it, however, is an advertisement for a Chinese website called fuckdiy.net which sells sex aids and toys. The ad depicts a womans buttocks with, um, one of those toys being used. At the bottom is a list of other government speeches and documents, first one being on Hu Jintao’s Eight Honors and Eight Shames. Hilarious.

The New York Times reports of people getting ambushed by a sneaky Falun Gong performance at Radio City Music Hall:

Before long came a ballet piece in which three women were imprisoned by a group of officers, and one was killed. At the end of the number, more members of the audience, in twos and fours and larger groups, began to walk out. At intermission, dozens of people, perhaps a few hundred, were leaving.

Apparently, this part of the program wasn’t advertised:

Advertisements for the show, which have appeared on Metro-North trains and in The New York Times, among other places, make no mention of Falun Gong. Nor do the show’s Web site or the brochures being handed out on Manhattan sidewalks. The brochures include what appears to be an endorsement quotation from Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg: “Brings to life the rich traditions of ancient China right here in the Big Apple.”

However, a spokesman for the mayor, John Gallagher, said that Mr. Bloomberg had neither seen the show nor praised it, and that the quotation may have been taken from a greeting card Mr. Bloomberg sent to Chinese-American organizations in which he saluted Chinese New Year celebrations in general.

The Chinese Embassy, shockingly, comes out sounding downright, um, reasonable and accurate:

In a statement, the Chinese Embassy criticized the network for trying to “inveigle the public into watching the show,” and said, “The truth is that the so-called ‘galas’ were nothing but a sheer political tool used by ‘Falun Gong’ organization to spread cult and anti-China propaganda.”

But the New York Times ends on this interesting quote:

Joe Wei, national editor of the World Journal, a Chinese-American newspaper that is based in Queens and that takes no position on the practice and its teachings, said he saw one of the group’s shows about one year ago and detected no Falun Gong imagery. “This would be a major change,” he said. “I don’t know why they want to do this.”

Uh, Joe? It was the same last year. You might want to think back…

Falun Gong Show Called Propaganda
Oakland Tribune January 20, 2007

…Performances of the popular “Chinese New Year Spectacular” are being held at high-profile venues in 28 cities worldwide, including Radio City Music Hall in New York City and San Francisco’s War Memorial Opera House, where audience members paid up to $168 per ticket earlier this month.

The variety show, now in its fourth year and themed “Myths and Legends,” features singers, musicians and dancers in elaborate costumes and celestial settings. Several segments reference Falun Gong’s spiritual beliefs and persecution in China. One dance depicts a practitioner who is jailed, beaten and killed by Chinese policemen who are later punished by supernatural beings.

All of it is the same, including “endorsements”:

The show’s program features letters of support from a long list of American officials, including Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., and Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger.

Aides for Schwarzenegger and Boxer said they had simply responded to requests for Chinese New Year greetings, and hadn’t seen the show and weren’t aware of its Falun Gong connections.

Sneaking political content into Chinese New Years performances? Gosh, who else would do something like that? Yknow, I think Americans should go see this show at Radio City. They’d actually be getting a more genuine modern Chinese experience than they realize.

* I missed the CCTV snore-a-thon this evening, but I’m willing to bet they stuck in an extra special something about collectivism in the face of adversity due to the recent weather problems. Can anybody tell me if they had any ham-handed messages of old school socialist unity?