Skip to content

Mutant Palm

  • About
  • Historical Chinese Image Collections
  • SchizOlympics: Words Fail Us Bibliography

Chinese Media on Dam Earthquake Link

Posted on February 6, 2009 by davesgonechina

James Fallows wishes he was in China right now to “see first-hand” how people in China are reacting to reports that dam construction may have led to the Sichuan earthquake last year. Here’s a rough translation of the only media report I’ve seen so far addressing the issue:

Foreign Media Stir Up Trouble, Speculate “Sichuan Earthquake was Man-Made”

In the past few days, western media has been spreading the following kind of statement – “Large Dam is the Cause of Last Year’s Sichuan Earthquake”, followed by the rumor that the earthquake in turn induced the current northern drought. Experts believe Western media’s linking of natural and man-made disasters is unscientific and irresponsible.

On January 3rd the British newspaper The Daily Telegraph published a story filed by Shanghai correspondent Malcolm [Moore, only first name published] quoting a “Chinese scientist” saying “Construction and filling of the Zipingpu reservoir in Sichuan altered pressure on fault lines, most likely causing the earthquake.” According to the report, Columbia University professor [Christian] Klose holds the same opinion. This quickly became a hot news item in the Western media. The Associated Press and other media all trumpeted the man-made aspect in their headlines, and a few included photographs of the earthquake’s aftermath to give it additional visual impact.

Gao Jianguo, Vice Secretary General of the China Association for Disaster Prevention said the Zipingpu reservoir couldn’t have brought about so large an earthquake, as a reservoir has never created an earthquake registering over 7.0 in modern history. Experts believe that in covering China’s natural disasters, Western media should use a more objective and scientific approach.

In addition, in regards to Western statements that “China’s current drought was brought on by the earthquake”, the National Climate Center’s director of forecasting Zhang Peiqun says the present drought and the Wenchuan earthquake have no direct connection. “This years major drought is the result of slow changes since last October, primarily the persistent lack of rain. These two events are separated by 5 to 6 months, it is extremely difficult to link them together.” Gao Jianguo says that in disaster research there is a theory of “disaster chains”. One type is a “drought-earthquake chain”. Before an earthquake, underground heat rises up. Up to three years before an earthquake there will normally be a drought. A “flash flood chain” follows the earthquake, as hundreds of kilometers of faultlines can emerge and subterranean water can surface, leading to an increase in rainfall. To say the earthquake was the cause is to obviously reverse the sequence by mistake.

I don’t know anything about geology or climate science, but saying that a reservoir has never caused an earthquake over 7.0 sounds like weak sauce. Doesn’t that mean Gao Jianguo is agreeing that it might have, just as the Western media is saying?

Posted in China

Post navigation

Bad Tea Leaves
Chinese Historical Image Collections

4 thoughts on “Chinese Media on Dam Earthquake Link”

  1. eswn says:
    May 24, 2020 at 6:24 pm

    try this (in Chinese):

    http://www.xys.org/xys/ebooks/others/science/misc/wenchuan502.txt

    Don’t worry about the geology bits; just stick to how Fan Xiao (mis-)represented the earthquake time series data about the history of Zipingpu reservoir earthquakes … he cited a list of low magnitude earthquakes in the area as indication of the potential hazards, except they were recorded before the Zipingpu reservoir even began taking in any water!

    You have to be very, very careful about these people and their assertions. I don’t know who to trust here …

  2. DJ says:
    May 24, 2020 at 6:24 pm

    Please also see this:

    http://www.xys.org/xys/ebooks/others/science/misc/wenchuan518.txt

    By the way, this specific theory was first reported in China 10 days after the earthquake.

    http://county.aweb.com.cn/2008/5/22/480200805220901370.html

  3. Stephan Larose says:
    May 24, 2020 at 6:24 pm

    The underground pressures that cause earthquakes are billions of times more powerful than what is needed to shake a dam, the additional weight of concrete and water is negligible. This is not science.

  4. TRW says:
    May 24, 2020 at 6:24 pm

    Crazy. All I know is that when the earthquake hit last year we were living in Yichang and the dam was on our minds. Of course, I was worried about what the earthquake might do to the dam. It is well known that damns of that size have an effect on seismic activity, and as for drought it seems plausible. But it would be a big admission.

Comments are closed.

Recent Posts

  • Survey Says… “Oops”
  • Happy China Internet Maintenance Day!
  • CIRC 2009
  • Chinese Al Jazeera? No Chance.
  • Teacup Feet

Recent Comments

  • kamagra 50mg on SchizOlympics: Words Fail Us Bibliography
  • kamagra oral jelly on About
  • wbflw on About
  • siteme on About
  • cheap viagra on Historical Chinese Image Collections

Archives

  • May 2013
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007

Categories

  • China
  • Uncategorized

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: MiniZen by Martin Stehle.